Dear Trevor Robert Anthony I finally have had a few minutes to respond to your excellent question about why we use Hadith? I will first post your question and reply in short. I want to write it here so that others may benefit from it. Or correct me if I am wrong. "Assalumualaikum. I have a question that you may see often. I have tried to seek scholarly opinions, and still get mixed answers. Please forgive me for asking, but I really want to find the correct answer. If the Quran tells us it is perfect alone. Needs no other book. Is compete. 6:38 says nothing is left out. 6:114 says Quran is fully detail. 7:12, 16:89 and 12:111 say that Quran is a full explanation of all things. 69:44 says "had he (Muhammad pbuh) taught anything else..." Saying that he taught Quran alone. And 45:6 tells us not to use Hadith... Then why do we use Hadith?" First, let me start by citing all the verses above in full text so that we can determine their relevance to the argument that...
Science is good, but only for this dunya and it sometimes fails to see you through because there is one extra variable, perhaps two, maybe three or more you have not taken into account. Sometimes it fails you because your moment came before you tabulate the result of your most recent lab experiment. Of course, it is good for the Hereafter as well, but that one needs someone whose heart radiates with true light. Brain cells alone are not enough. Science is not the anti-thesi s of religion. It is simply that tool which some atheists force to assume the role of God, since they suffer from chronic cerebral anemia and cannot see beyond matter. Science is the perfect religion for those who have no religion, and it is a useful tool for those who have one and would like to understand how their Lord ordered the physical universe around them, with a pragmatic understanding to improve their lives. However, since perfection is not a part of this Dunya atheists' worshiping of science is...
I was tagged this morning in a post by a Mauritanian friend, Zeidane Brahim which reads: "After reading the well detailed Max Blumenthal's article "Weddady’s Free Arabs, American Islamic Congress and the pro-Israel funders who helped them rise," I concluded that Nasser Weddady is conversely guilty until proven innocent. Regarding Weddady's status as a public figure, Mauritanian intelligentsia living in the USA are however, expected to enlighten the public opinion about what is exactly happening over there. In spite of Mohamed El Mokhtar's article "Unfortunate and Disturbing Report: Weddady Has Some Explaining to Do" and its translation by Dr. Elycheikh Ahmed-Tolba, the issue is still obscure." "Weddady’s Free Arabs, American Islamic Congress and the pro-Israel funders who helped them rise" I wrote the following reply to his post. Selam Zeindane Brahim, I will say something here since your post appears on my wall, ...
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق